Browse tags
2600(1)
activisim(1)
ai(3)
air quality(2)
analog(1)
apple(5)
attention(1)
audio(1)
batteries(1)
bicycle(4)
blogging(15)
bread(1)
change”(1)
climate change(15)
co2(6)
community(3)
computing(25)
cooking(1)
css(1)
cycling(1)
design(3)
design”(1)
development(1)
digital nomad(1)
django(2)
drm(1)
economy(1)
education(1)
electricity(3)
electrification(6)
email(1)
energy(8)
environment(2)
fashion(1)
finland(1)
health(3)
heating(1)
iOS(1)
indieweb(8)
induction(1)
infastructure(2)
internet(11)
japan(7)
language(1)
life(1)
linux(1)
macos(4)
map(1)
media”(1)
mental health(1)
music(2)
nostalgia(10)
nyc(1)
octopus energy(1)
pandemic(3)
paper(1)
photo(1)
photography(2)
plastic(1)
podcast(1)
politics(3)
pollution(1)
portugal(1)
privacy(5)
privacy apple(1)
product(1)
productivity(1)
programming(6)
project management(1)
python(5)
renewables(5)
running(2)
search(1)
skincare(1)
smartphones(1)
social media(11)
software(3)
solar(4)
space(2)
taiwan(1)
trains(2)
transit(1)
travel(4)
urban design(2)
video(19)
wind(2)
“climate(1)
“social(1)
“urban(1)
-
🔗 You can have two Big Things, but not three
No you can’t “have it all.” You can have two things, but not three.
source
Forget work/life integration for a minute. How much time do you have, regardless of partitioning?
From your 24-hour daily allotment, the 1950s-style break-down isOuch this one rings true. I reckon the choice for me in this list is kids and job at the moment. Though I bet this will change as the boy gains more independence and gets busy with his own stuff. Bittersweet that will be.